A travel concerto for the Bach family
Updated: Oct 28, 2022
Johannes Pramsohler puts the first version of Brandenburg Concerto No. 5 in a cosmopolitan context of travelling virtuosos
To make it clear from the start, a “travel concerto” genre does not exist. However, what one can observe time and again are certain characteristics that indicate that many a baroque solo concerto was conceived especially for journeys. The epoch of internationally touring virtuosos indeed first came into full bloom with Paganini and Liszt, and yet even a century earlier there were already opportunities for guest appearances for which soloists had to have suitable works in their baggage. And suitable was that with which one could shine to best advantage in a foreign place, and also make the task as easy as possible for the local “accompanists” (and thus also for oneself). Paganini, by the way, traveled with his own performing parts, distributing them shortly before the concert and collecting them again immediately afterward.
The Fifth Brandenburg Concerto is in many respects such a “travel concerto.” In the original version recorded here, it could very well have served as a showpiece for the harpsichordist Bach at the debut concert during his visit to Dresden in 1717. In the second movement, Bach treated a theme by the French organist Louis Marchand, with whom a competition was planned in Dresden, which however never came about. In the outer movements can be recognized indirect quotations from violin concertos by Vivaldi, which had a strong tradition in Dresden. One can well imagine that the relatively simple parts for flute and violin were managed without difficulty by the Dresden soloists Buffardin and Pisendel, playing at sight, for a spontaneous concert even without a rehearsal.
It was also eminently suitable as a bravura piece for the spa sojourns in Karlsbad by Bach’s princely employer. Prince Leopold traveled on a regular basis during the high season to the noble spa town, which served not only as a chic meeting place of the high nobility, but also as a platform for artists. Invoices show that during his second journey in 1718, the prince spent considerably more money than during the first stay a year earlier. The new Kapellmeister Johann Sebastian Bach and his musicians undoubtedly contributed to a splendid representation. Thus, on 9 May, one traveled to Karlsbad and probably noticed only upon arrival that a suitable instrument was not available, and for this reason the elaborate and costly conveyance was organized for the “Prince’s ClaviCymbel,” which then arrived on 28 May.
In 1719 Bach personally ordered a new instrument from Michael Mietke and later traveled again to Berlin to pick it up – had the other one been damaged on the return journey from Karlsbad? As can be seen from a comparison of the original version with the later autograph score, Bach continually undertook revisions of the Fifth Brandenburg Concerto. Thus, not only was the violoncello part rewritten and a Violone-grosso part added, but above all the original eighteen-measure cadenza was formed into the famous sixty-four-measure cadenza – presumably to highlight the likewise musical prince and his new, wickedly expensive harpsichord.
It is very likely that the later version also belonged to the Bach family’s travel baggage, with Johann Sebastian himself on the harpsichord, Wilhelm Friedemann as violinist, and Carl Philipp Emanuel as flutist. Moreover, it is to be assumed that the Bachs’ music trunk also contained cantatas such as Mein Herze schwimmt im Blut and Jauchzet Gott in allen Landen – with Anna Magdalena Bach as professionally trained singer and her brother Johann Caspar on trumpet, the family was well equipped for small-scale concerts.
A feature of the Fifth Brandenburg Concerto is the simple orchestral accompaniment in the form of Violino grosso – a ripieno violin part (in place of the usual two) that can also be played satisfactorily by a single violin – to keep the traveling ensemble, and with that the expenses, relatively small, without forfeiting the solo-tutti effect, on the one hand and, on the other, because one never knows what to expect in terms of orchestral musicians at a guest appearance.
For our recording, we decided to play the concerto without a double bass as we know that around 1718 there was still no 16-foot instrument in Cöthen. We also carefully kept all the original slurs and articulations which in some places give the piece an entirely different feel than the famous second version. The fact that Bach slurs so much in this first version inspired us to opt for slurs elsewhere as well.
Listen / Stream / Buy album here.
Listen / Stream / Buy album here.
While exploring https://88rpvip.com/ I paid attention to how the website presents its information and guides visitors through the different sections. I found the page structure practical, with clearly defined categories that make browsing feel more organized. One detail I appreciated was the consistent presentation across the pages, which helped me understand the layout without repeatedly searching for the right section. In my experience, thoughtful organization can make a website easier to use and more comfortable to revisit.
There is something appealing about understanding materials and practical workshop tasks, especially when the focus stays on the details people might otherwise overlook. Knowing what a component needs to do can make choosing a material easier to discuss. That thought gives me a starting point for exploring practical technical skills in connection with Zhpifa. The smaller details are what I would want to return to, especially when an explanation feels too broad. Which questions should come before comparing different technical options?
I find exploring everyday food and cooking traditions easier to approach when there is a familiar situation to start from. An ingredient can carry a story about the place or family that uses it. For Aubouchonlyonnais, I would use food and cooking ideas as a starting point for a closer discussion of the subject. It leaves me curious about the steps between understanding an idea and putting it into practice. Which part of a recipe would you ask someone to explain beyond the written measurements?
I came across VIPJL during an online search for materials connected to something I wanted to explore. I opened the website to get a general idea of its presentation and content organization. After looking through the main areas, I felt that the layout was quite straightforward. Different categories were separated clearly, which helped prevent the page from looking too busy. The headings also seemed appropriately arranged, making it easier for visitors to recognize each section and follow the information while browsing.
A discussion of following curiosity through everyday information seems more useful when it connects an idea with something easy to picture. A clear question can turn a casual interest into something easier to explore. With Yh75u in mind, Yh75u learning ideas feels like a topic worth exploring one question at a time. It leaves me curious about the steps between understanding an idea and putting it into practice. How do you decide which detail deserves a closer look before moving on?